“Give us this day our daily bread.”
In the Our Father, “bread” becomes the representative not only of all nourishment on earth, but our surpassing nourishment in the Eucharist. Unless we eat this bread, we will not only go hungry, we will “not have life” (see John 6:53). For a while, 16th and 17th century missionaries in Asia translated this petition of the Lord's prayer as “give us this day our daily rice.” That didn't go over well with the authorities back in Rome. It may have communicated the aspect of earthly nourishment accurately enough, but it lost the Eucharistic connection with the Bread of Eternal Life. And so the Church still prays three times every day (Morning Prayer, Mass and Evening Prayer) for “daily bread.”
In the Our Father, “bread” becomes the representative not only of all nourishment on earth, but our surpassing nourishment in the Eucharist. Unless we eat this bread, we will not only go hungry, we will “not have life” (see John 6:53). For a while, 16th and 17th century missionaries in Asia translated this petition of the Lord's prayer as “give us this day our daily rice.” That didn't go over well with the authorities back in Rome. It may have communicated the aspect of earthly nourishment accurately enough, but it lost the Eucharistic connection with the Bread of Eternal Life. And so the Church still prays three times every day (Morning Prayer, Mass and Evening Prayer) for “daily bread.”
Yet by now all of us know someone for whom
bread, whether the limp white sandwich bread of our childhood PBJs or
the crusty artisanal loaves in a high-end bakery, is not nourishing
at all. Bread, the simplest of culinary delights, is for persons with
celiac disease, not food but life-sapping poison. Those who are
“merely” gluten intolerant may not suffer the same degree of
physical damage from eating grain-based foods, but they know there is
a price to pay if they indulge in a bagel or a cupcake.
Paul Graham knows what that is like,
and in In Memory of Bread: A Memoir he shares the experience of being cut off not only
from bread as food, but from the culture of bread (and of beer!).
There is a special poignancy to Graham's narrative of coming back,
literally, from death's door only to discover that he had to give up
two of his favorite hobbies, two crafts that had brought him immense
pleasure not only in the eating (or imbibing, as the case may be) but
in the fellowship built around the products of grain: home bread
making and beer brewing.
With Graham's book those of us whose daily bread can be, in fact, bread learn what it is like to
suddenly be deprived of such a common and seemingly harmless food. Graham's struggle to find food that was (a) like bread and (b) still worth eating highlights an important dimension of culture: the common table. To lose bread is to be cut off from your fellows, as well as from a vital connection with 10,000 years of tradition.
When something as basic as bread (and
in Graham's case, even the generally-tolerated oats) is off the
table, relationships—and not just menus—have to be
renegotiated, rediscovered, relearned. But the first of the
relationships affected by Graham's sudden illness (and its almost
equally drastic “cure”) was his relationship with his wife, Bec.
From the very first, Bec decided that she and Paul would bear this
burden together. Paul's inability to tolerate ordinary grains (and
products made with grain) would not create a division at their common
table with the “haves” (Bec) and the “have nots” (Paul). She
would scrutinize labels and clear the house of anything unsafe for
Paul to eat. She would experience the same loss, and the same, almost
desperate search for bread that was at the same time gluten-free and
real, as in real, identifiable bread. She would adopt a gluten-free
diet with him.
Graham found that relearning his life
after celiac disease included finding a tolerable gluten-free beer
that he could drink with his softball buddies after a game. It meant
neighbors and friends going out of their way to provide gluten-free
canapes at cocktail parties, and the disappointment of many
imitations of bread (the saddest of all: imitation pizza). The
Grahams had long adopted a “locavore” ethos, supporting local
farms and limiting their food choices to produce, meats and cheeses
that had been raised in the vicinity. Until Paul's diagnosis, this
included local wheat with which to bake the fragrant loaves that
were now out of the picture. It became necessary to purchase
items that could not be produced locally: psyllium, xantham gum,
tapioca starch.
With so few restaurants in their rural
New York town offering gluten-free options at the time, he had to
rely more and more on the exotic. As wonderful as those Asian (hold
the soy sauce, please) or African or Latino meals were, they were not
the food he grew up with: they did not satisfy his human hunger. They
were not bread.
Accompanying Graham and his wife on
their search for satisfying bread, we learn about grain production
and the culture that took root when grains were first domesticated.
With him, we learn the forms of bread in various parts of the world.
I had no idea that buckwheat blini are a
traditional (and gluten-free) French crepe (buckwheat is not really “wheat”), or that chickpea
flatbread is a (gluten-free) tradition in Nice as well as in India.
Did the Grahams finally find a bread
that was both safe to eat and a real connection to the memories and
cultures that were woven into their lives? Would they ever be able to
bake real bread at home again? Did Paul find a decent beer for his ballgames? No spoilers here.
In Memory of Bread was an
engaging read from first to last, with some laugh-out-loud lines in
just about every chapter. It disabuses the reader of any notion of a
fashionable gluten-free “lifestyle” while giving us a little clue
about just what we are asking for, simply on the level of this good
earth, when we pray “give us this day our daily bread.”
Disclosure of Material Connection: I
received a free review copy of the book mentioned above with the
expectation that I would mention it on my blog. I am committed to
giving as honest a review as possible as part of my community's
mission of putting media at the service of the truth. In addition,
some of the links in the post above are “affiliate links.” This
means if you click on the link and purchase the item, I will receive
an affiliate commission. I am disclosing this in accordance with the
Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning
the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”
No comments:
Post a Comment